![[Chuck]](images/messier/cm.jpg)
Charles
Messier came to Paris in 1751 at the age of 21. He was hired by the
astronomer Joseph Delisle as a draftsman, and as a recorder of
astronomical observations. By 1754 he was also an accomplished
observer, and at about that time he took a position at the Marine
Observatory in Paris as a clerk.
This was the time when astronomers were anticipating the first
predicted arrival of Halley's Comet. Delisle had made a map of the
routes by which the comet could approach to arrive at its predicted
perihelion, and Messier, his observing assistant, thus had the inside
track in discovering (or rediscovering) it. He searched for 18 months,
but in vain - Delisle had in fact miscalculated.
Meanwhile on Christmas night, 1758, a German farmer named Johann Georg
Palitzsch discovered the comet. A month later, Messier did as well,
having not heard of Palitzsch's success (no Internet). Delisle would
not let Messier announce his discovery, until after Palitzsch's news
finally reached Paris. This loss of 'credit' may well have forged
Messier's determination to discover more comets.
After Delisle's retirement, Messier continued observing from the Hotel
de Cluny. He discovered the comet of 1764, and (with the naked-eye) saw
the comet of 1766. Over the next 15 years, nearly all comet discoveries
were made by Messier. One perhaps apocryphal story relates that while
at Messier sat at his wife's deathbed, a rival astronomer discovered a
comet. When a friend consoled him on his loss, he said, "Alas! I have
discovered a dozen of them; Montagne had to take away the 13th!" Only
then did he realize that his friend was talking about the loss of his
wife!
Hotel de Cluny as it
appeared in Messier's day.
Messier did more than look for comets - he observed occultations,
transits, eclipses, and sunspots. He was no theoretician, however; for
all his comet discoveries, his assistants reduced his observations to
the orbital elements.
In 1758, he wrote, "When the comet of 1758 was between the horns of
Taurus, I discovered above the southern horn and a short distance from
the star Zeta Tauri a whitish light, extended in the form of a candle
light, which contained no stars. This light was a little like that of a
comet I had observed before; however, it was a little too bright, too
white, and top elongated to be a comet, which had always appeared to me
almost round,..." It was the Crab nebula in Taurus - M1, and was duly
plotted on the chart of the comet. The next object, the globular
cluster in Aquarius, was observed in 1760.
By 1764, Messier had accumulated a number of such 'false comets' and
began to make a list of them. In seven months Messier cataloged 40
objects - including the Hercules cluster (M13), the Omega (M17) and
Trifid (M20) nebulas, the Dumbbell planetary nebula (M27), and the
Andromeda galaxy (M31). To make his list as complete as possible, he
added objects from previous catalogs by Edmund Halley (only five
objects), William Derham, and Lacaille.
In 1765, he discovered the open cluster near Sirius (M41). In 1769, he
also determined the positions of the previously-known Orion nebula
(M42, M43), the Pleiades (M45), and Praesepe (the Beehive) to bring his
list to 45 in time for his admission to the Academie Royale des
Sciences in 1770, where it was published as
Catalogue des Nebuleuses et des amas
d'Etoiles, que l'on decouvre parmi les Etoiles fixes, sur l'horizon de
Paris in 1771. Three nights after presenting this memoir, he
recorded the positions of four more clusters!
In the years following, a few more objects were discovered in
connection with comet searches. A break took place in 1779, when the
comet of that year passed across the Coma - Virgo region, leading to
the first sightings of the brighter galaxies of that area. The next
year, he observed the M65 and M66 galaxies in Leo, to bring his list to
68 in time for the publication of the French almanac,
Connaissance des Temps.
A few of the Messier objects have been mysterious or controversial,
although it seems that most of the problems have been worked out by
now. For example, the description given by Messier of M47:
7h 44m 16s, -1°
16'
42". Cluster
of stars a short distance from the preceding, (M46 cluster) the stars
are
brighter; the middle of the cluster was compared with the same star, 2
Navis.
The cluster contains no nebulosity.
Messier's descriptions of his telescopes are rather unsatisfying; he
usually says something like "easily visible in a telescope of two feet"
(focal length). In fact, his favorite telescope was actually a
Gregorian reflector with a focal length of 32 inches and an aperture of
7 1/2 inches. The mirrors were of polished speculum metal, which would
mean a light-gathering power about equivalent to a three-inch modern
aluminized glass mirror. (I think we should do our Messier Marathon
using 80 mm telescopes!)
By this time, Messier had a new rival, Pierre Mechain, an astronomer at
the naval map archives in Paris, who was 14 years his junior. In 1781,
Mechain discovered two new comets, and in the course of his searches
also found 32 new nebulous objects, which he communicated to Messier.
Messier would then observe the new objects and add them to his list in
the order he (Messier) observed them. Mechain discovered many new Virgo
cluster galaxies. In light of Messier's previous jealousy about comet
discoveries, it is surprising that the historical record betrays no
such jealousy towards Mechain.
In April of 1781 the list stood at 100, with 24 of these having been
referred from Mechain. That November, Messier had a serious fall into
an icehouse, breaking his arm, leg, and two ribs. Messier did not
resume observing until a year after. In 1784, the list was republished,
including three new objects from Mechain that Messier had not had time
to verify. M102 is another 'mystery' object, although it turns out that
Mechain sent a letter to Bernoulli stating that it was actually a
mistake, being identical to M101. (In the modern list, M102 is assigned
to NGC 5866, which matches Mechain's position and description.) In this
letter, Mechain also describes six new objects, bringing the list to
107 (discounting 102). In 1787, the list was republished in its final
form during Messier's lifetime, this time edited by Mechain. The
printed description of the Owl Nebula (M97) makes reference to three
more undescribed objects in the vicinity. This, together with marginal
notes on a copy of the 1787 list in Messier's hand, and a few other
objects known to have been observed by Messier has been used to extend
the list to the present 110 objects.
By 1790, revolution and economic turmoil brought trying times for
Messier, who lost his navy pension and salary. In spite of
circumstances, he managed to discover another comet in 1793. As the
political situation stabilized, Messier was elected to the new Academy
of Sciences, and received the Legion of Honor from Napoleon. He lived
to the age of 86, dying on April 12, 1817.
Looking back on his interest in nebulae, Messier wrote in the
Connaissance des Temps for 1801:
What
caused me to undertake the catalogue was the nebula I discovered above
the southern horn of Taurus on September 12, 1758, while observing the
comet of that year.... This nebula had such a resemblance to a comet,
in its form and brightness, that I endeavored to find others, so that
astronomers would not confuse these same nebulae with comets just
beginning to shine. I observed further with the proper refractors for
the search of comets, and this is the purpose I had in forming the
catalogue. After me, the celebrated Herschel published a catalogue of
2,000 which he has observed. This unveiling of the sky, made with
instruments of great aperture, does not help in a perusal of the sky
for faint comets. Thus my object is different from his, as I only need
nebulae visible in a telescope of two feet [length]. Since the
publication of my catalogue I have observed still others; I will
publish them in the future, according to the order of right ascension,
for the purpose of making them more easy to recognize, and for those
searching for comets to remain in less uncertainty.
(This
article is largely abstracted from "Messier and His Catalogue" by Owen
Gingerich, to which the interested reader is referred for further
details.)
Article courtesy of
Mark
Miller